Mr. He joined Zhu's company in early 2021. After a short time working together, they began a relationship.

Zhu decided to use money to ensure He was entirely hers. The director visited the hospital where Ms. Chen (He's wife) was being treated after the shock of discovering her husband's infidelity. Zhu told Chen that she loved He and couldn't live without him.

She transferred 3 million CNY to Chen as compensation for the divorce and child support on He's behalf. In the agreement, this sum was recorded as "child support and assistance".

A month later, He and Chen finalized their divorce.

A year later, the relationship between the director and the employee reached an impasse. Conflicts arose constantly. Zhu decided to break up and filed a lawsuit, demanding He and his ex-wife return the 3 million CNY.

The initial judgment considered the money Chen received to be essentially a "husband-buying contract," violating social norms. The court deemed it an invalid gift and ordered its return to Zhu.

In the appeal hearing in early 9/2025, the judges determined Zhu failed to prove it was a gift, but rather a payment on He's behalf for divorce and child support obligations. Zhu's later citing of "ulterior motives" for reclaiming the money was considered contrary to the principle of good faith.

The court applied the rule that "expenses for illegal purposes will not be refunded," thereby dismissing Zhu's entire appeal.

The case is causing a stir on Chinese social media. Lawyers suggest it highlights the blurred line between "gifting" and "paying on behalf of" in romantic relationships.

Zhu's failure serves as a warning that using money to interfere in marriages not only poses ethical risks, but also carries unpredictable legal consequences.

Bao Nhien (Sina)